Comparing Political Systems: A Closer Look at the United Kingdom and Bangladesh

The world is made up of various political systems, each unique in its own way. In this article, we will compare and contrast the political systems of two countries – the United Kingdom and Bangladesh.

The United Kingdom, also known as the UK, is a constitutional monarchy. This means that the country is ruled by a monarch, currently Queen Elizabeth II, who holds a ceremonial position and has limited political power. The UK has a parliamentary system of government, where the executive branch is led by the Prime Minister and the legislative branch is comprised of the House of Commons and the House of Lords.

On the other hand, Bangladesh is a democratic country only by name with a parliamentary system of government. The country gained independence from Pakistan in 1971 and has since been a democracy. However, in recent years, there have been allegations of autocratic rule of Sheik hasina and suppression of opposition voices.

One of the major differences between the political systems of the UK and Bangladesh is the role of the monarchy. In the UK, the monarch has a symbolic role and is expected to remain politically neutral. However, in Bangladesh, the position of the Prime Minister has become more powerful and there have been accusations of her becoming a de-facto monarch. The current Prime Minister, Sheikh Hasina, has been in power since 2009 and has been accused of authoritarianism and suppressing opposition parties.

In terms of the legislative branch, both countries have a bicameral system. However, in the UK, the House of Lords is mainly comprised of appointed members, while in Bangladesh, the members of the upper house, known as the Jatiya Sangsad, are elected by the people.

Another key difference is the electoral system. In the UK, the first-past-the-post system is used, where the candidate with the most votes in a constituency wins the seat in the House of Commons. In contrast, Bangladesh uses a proportional representation system, where political parties are allocated seats in the Jatiya Sangsad based on the percentage of votes they receive.

One of the most concerning issues in the political system of Bangladesh is the lack of freedom of speech and press. In the UK, there is a strong tradition of free speech and a free press, with media outlets being able to criticize the government without fear of repercussions. However, in Bangladesh, there have been instances of journalists and activists being arrested for speaking out against the government.

In the UK, there is a strong system of checks and balances, with the judiciary having the power to review decisions made by the government and the Parliament. In Bangladesh, there have been concerns about the independence of the judiciary, with allegations of the government influencing court decisions.

In conclusion, while both the United Kingdom and Bangladesh have parliamentary systems of government, there are significant differences in their political systems. The UK has a long-standing tradition of democracy and a strong system of checks and balances, while Bangladesh has faced challenges in upholding democratic values and ensuring the independence of its institutions. It is crucial for the government of Bangladesh to address these concerns and work towards creating a truly democratic system that respects the rights and voices of all its citizens.

Please support us by visit and share your comments on : https://bdrealissues.blog/ and https://daily-nobojug.com/