Awami League killed the accused before interrogation and without giving them chance to defend themselves.

Let’s say that five years from today, the murder trial of Juboree Guru Ibrahim is taking place. We all know that Parliamentarian Nurunnabi Chowdhury Shaon shot and killed Ibrahim with his own hands. Investigators investigated based on Shaon’s statement under section 164 and said – Nurunnabi Chowdhury Shaon is personally responsible for this murder. He also gave this statement a charge sheet. But two years after giving this accusation sheet, the government suddenly called for further investigation into Ibrahim’s murder. And the responsibility for that investigation was given to Kohinoor Saheb, a popular police officer during the BNP government.

Two hundred days after Kohinoor Sahib’s remand, Nurunnabi Chowdhury Shaon came to the court one day and issued a supplementary statement under section 164, saying – Sheikh Hasina is responsible for Ibrahim’s murder, herself but I do not remember the date or time he gave the order. Will Sheikh Hasina accept this testimony of Nurunnabi Chowdhury Shawon? Awami League lawyers will not verify this evidence. Yes, of course you are. This is the process of validating evidence, and this process is called “examination” in English cross-examination. Cross-examination is the process by which a defense attorney cross-examines a witness to determine the truth or falsity of a testimony before a court. Because of this cross-examination, it is not easy to get away with perjury.

What was named by Mufti Hannan in 2007-11-2 in the grenade attack of 8-21, in 2011 after 3 years of torture by the Awami League, many more names were added.Among them are many important figures, including Tariq Rahman. They were involved in the case based on the testimony of Mufti Hanan. They were brought to justice. But ironically, it’s true, the defense did not have a chance to cross-examine Mufti Hannan. Shortly before Mufti Hannan’s interrogation, he was hanged in another case. Mufti Hannan’s testimony was not given the opportunity to determine whether it was true or false. For the withdrawal of the statement of Section 164 obtained through torture, which explains the indescribable torture given to him during remand while he is still alive.

Mufti Hannan said he met with Tariq Rahman at Hawa Bhaban. If only Tariq Rahman’s lawyer asked him how many floors of Hawa Bhaban. Only then will it be proved that Mufti Hannan will not go within 1 kilometer of the building and will never go to the building. Thus, unjustly, today only the testimony of Mufti Hanan is used to sentence Tariq Rahman to death. India has already been informed of what the verdict will be based on pinak Ranjan printing a text that anyone can read online. Awami League has shown how to kill the accused and hang innocent people before interrogation, that way can ever stop.

Please support us by visit and share your comments on : https://bdrealissues.blog/ and https://daily-nobojug.com/